Bequest of Property

Why the Louisiana Succession Doesn't Ever Get Done...And How to Make Sure Yours Does Get Done

Two reasons estates don't get settled are (1) the survivors are unaware of the need to complete the probate (in Louisiana we call it a "Succession"); and (2) at least one of the participants is not cooperative.

For prospective law firm clients who want to schedule a free 15 minute initial phone call with Paul Rabalais, go to: https://go.oncehub.com/Paul8

It is not uncommon for someone to pass away leaving survivors, and those survivors are unaware of the need to complete the probate of the deceased family member. For example, let's day Dad dies. Dad and Mom had purchased a home 35 years earlier. After Dad dies, Mom decides to continue living in their home. Mom has access to all of the joint bank accounts, and Mom was the designated beneficiary of Dad's IRA. She doesn't even think about seeing a lawyer to complete a Succession. Years later, Mom wants and needs to move into an assisted living facility. She decides to sell the home to help cover the expenses of moving and living in the assisted living facility. She puts the house up for sale, finds a buyer, and signs a purchase agreement. The buyer's title attorney conducts a title examination and discovers the home is still in the names of both Dad and Mom. The buyer's title attorney says, "No sale will take place until Dad's probate is complete!" So the sale is suspended, or perhaps worse, the buyer backs out of the sale.

We often see surviving family members unaware of the need to complete a Succession after their loved one dies. Perhaps the deceased owned a rental property and the family merely continued to collect rent from a tenant but never went through the Louisiana Succession to get the title transferred. Perhaps the deceased had owned a one-third undivided interest in family property, with her two siblings, and no one bothered to include that as a Succession asset after she died. Perhaps the deceased owned real estate out of state, and the Louisiana Succession does not transfer any of the real estate owned in the name of the Louisiana resident.

So there are many circumstances where surviving family members are unaware of the need to complete a Louisiana Succession after the death of a loved one. And when they finally uncover that need years later, it is more complicated because there is urgency, or perhaps an heir of the deceased passed away in the interim, making more probates necessary.

A second, and perhaps more frustrating, reason estates don't get settled, is when one or more of the participants is uncooperative. Neither the executor acting alone, or a majority of the heirs, can complete a Louisiana Succession by themselves.

In order to transfer assets of the decease to the heirs, a judge must sign a court order ordering third parties to transfer assets out of the name of the deceased, and into the names of the heirs. A judge will not sign the necessary court order until ALL OF THE PARTIES sign off on the petition requesting the judge to sign the order (this order is referred to as a "Judgment of Possession").

Sometimes a participant will refuse to sign the necessary paperwork - sometimes for valid reasons and sometimes for petty reasons. Nonetheless, one participant refusing to fully cooperation will stop an estate settlement in its tracks.

So what's the Solution? Twofold:

(1) On the planning side, particularly if you anticipate relationship issues among your heirs, establish an estate legal program to eliminate or minimize the potential for problems. Avoid probate. Put the right people in charge with the authority to get things done. Communicate your reasons exactly why you are doing what you are doing.

(2) Once a family member dies, make sure you have very quick and very open communication with all of the parties involved. This early and open communication will build trust among the parties, often eliminating discourse.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais

Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney

www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com

Phone: (225) 329-2450

What is a Survivorship Clause in a Will?

What is a survivorship clause in a last will and testament?

For prospective law firm clients who want to schedule a free 15 minute initial phone call with Paul Rabalais, go to: https://go.oncehub.com/Paul8

Quite frankly, it's a clause that is often in wills that no one understands, and is rarely applicable. It's one of those provisions that gets consumers to say something like, "Well I guess this is just more of that legalese that lawyers put in legal documents."

Here's some background: You cannot make a bequest of full ownership of an asset and require that they preserve it for another person. That, under Louisiana law, is called a prohibited substitution.

However, you may make a bequest of an asset to someone, and impose as a condition on the bequest, that they survive you for a stipulated period, which period shall not exceed six months after your death.

Let's say you leave your home to Harold. But if Harold were to die right after you (let's say one month after you), you would not want your home to go to Harold's heirs - you would want your home, rather, to go to Sally. You could leave your home to Harold subject to the suspensive condition that Harold survive you for six months. Then, when Harold dies one month after you die, your home will go to Sally, instead of Harold's heirs.

Since "Joe Public" doesn't, at first glance, understand the terms "suspensive condition" or "survivorship clause", these provisions often cause confusion and rarely are applicable.

One other note worth mentioning: the existence of a six month survivorship clause can hold up the Louisiana Succession, or perhaps even the trust settlement, because the rights of Harold, in our example above, are "in suspense" until the six month survivorship time period expires.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais

Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney

www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com

Phone: (225) 329-2450

Louisiana Trust Code Rules Regarding Shifting a Trust Beneficiary's Interest in Principal

Many people who put their estate plan in place do not understand the rules regarding the shifting of a trust beneficiary's interest in principal.

Occasionally, people who are putting their estate legal program in order want to make a bequest, in trust, for others - often grandchildren. Since the grandchildren are often young and immature, the grandparents often want to put stipulations on the bequest.

A common request goes something like, "I want to leave $100,000 to my grandchild when I die, but I want it to be in a trust. And if my grandchild doesn't go to college, or does drugs, or goes to jail, then that money will go back to other people I designate."

Well, you can certainly leave $100,000 in trust for another, but there are restrictions on your ability to shift that trust principal to someone else. One such restriction in the Louisiana Trust Code provides that the interest of a principal beneficiary is acquired immediately upon the creation of the trust. Once the grandparent passes away, the trust for the grandchild is created and that trust is for the grandchild only while the grandchild is alive.

What you CAN control is when the grandchild gets the principal. You could give the trustee the discretion regarding distributions of principal to the grandchild. So if the grandchild goes to jail, the trustee could exercise his or her discretion and perhaps never distribute the principal to the grandchild while the grandchild is alive.

Other controls you have include certain powers to direct principal when the grandchild dies. if the grandchild dies with descendants, you can state in the trust that the principal vests in one or more of his descendants. If the grandchild dies without descendants, you can direct who the principal vests in upon the grandchild's death.

And if you do not direct where the principal vests upon the beneficiary's death, then his interest vests in his heirs or legatees, subject to the terms of the trust.

In other words, get good legal help when you are leave a bequest, either through your last will and testament or your revocable living trust, to individuals (such as grandchildren) who you are unsure how they will turn out from a maturity standpoint. Failing to comply with the rules regarding the shifting of a beneficiary's interest in principal can cause all kinds of legal problems for your descendants in the future.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais

Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney

www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com

Phone: (225) 329-2450

Under What Circumstances Should You Give a Trustee the Discretion to Make Distributions to a Trust Beneficiary?

How much discretion should you give a trustee when you establish a trust for the benefit of one or more beneficiaries?

Trusts are set up for many different reasons. Sometimes people want to leave assets at their death to others, but they don't want the inheritors to receive the inheritance in one lump sum. Some people who leave an inheritance want to dictate what the inheritance is to be used for, and under what conditions they can receive it.

For example, let's say a grandparent wants to leave $150,000 to his grandchild. At the time that the grandparent is establishing his estate legal program through a Last Will or Living Trust, the grandchild is only six years old. So the grandparents is advised to leave the bequest in a trust for the benefit of the grandchild.

One decision the grandparent must make is who should be the trustee of this trust after the grandparent dies. Let's say the grandparent selects grandparent's child as the trustee.

And now the decision comes regarding when distributions can be made to or for the grandchild, from the trust, by the trustee.

When you establish a trust like this, you will make a decision regarding whether you want the trustee to have discretion or no discretion in making trust decisions.

If you choose to allow the trustee to exercise discretion in making distributions, you might include trust language that permits the trustee to make distributions to or for a beneficiary for the "health, education, maintenance, and support," of the beneficiary. This can work well when you have a trustee that you know will exercise that discretion in the best interests of the beneficiary. When you choose this option, you may believe that you don't know what future circumstances may bring, and you trust that the trustee will exercise their discretion in a manner consistent with your overall objectives. Perhaps you even communicate to your trustee during your lifetime how you would want the trustee to exercise their discretion.

On the other hand, you may wish to remove all discretion from the trustee, by providing something like, "I direct the trustee to distribute $1,500 monthly to the beneficiary until trust principal is gone."

Or, you might even get more restrictive by stating that the beneficiary must meet certain standards (GPA, no criminal activity, no drug use, etc.) before distributions can be made. However, the more restrictions you place in the trust, the more difficult it will be for a trustee to adapt to circumstances that may not have been able to have been contemplated at the time of the creation of the trust.

So, granting lots of trustee discretion allows a trustee to use their discretion in a manner that is consistent with your overall objectives, but it may create a situation where a beneficiary is badgering the trustee to exercise their discretion, so you'd need to designate a trustee that has the ability to say, "NO" to a beneficiary when appropriate.

Or, you may choose to eliminate trustee discretion by imposing specific restrictions in the trust that must be met for distributions to be made.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais

Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney

www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com

Phone: (225) 329-2450

If You Have a Revocable Living Trust, Then Why Do You Need a Last Will and Testament?

If you have a Revocable Living Trust, do you need a Last Will and Testament?

When someone dies with assets in their name, like real estate, or interests in a business, or investments, those assets will be frozen when they die, even if they have a Will disposing of them, and their survivors are stuck hiring lawyers and all will go through a court process commonly referred to as probate, or in Louisiana, a Succession.

Many people, in an effort to simplify their estate settlement and avoid the court process, often create a revocable living trust, and they transfer title of their assets to their trust while they are alive, so that when they pass away, the court process is avoided because assets in a trust bypass the whole “settle your estate through the court system” process. You simply designate a Successor Trustee of your trust who can immediately sell or disburse assets from your trust to your trust beneficiaries, all outside of government supervision.

Your trust replaces the Will because the trust instrument governs who gets what as it relates to trust assets.

But even if you establish your revocable living trust, you still need to have a Will just in case assets are in your name when you die. Maybe you left something out of trust. Perhaps you acquired an asset or account in your name after you established your trust, and you forgot to title it in the name of your trust.

Someone who utilizes a revocable living trust often has a last will that is often referred to as their “pour-over” Will because it pours over the assets in your name at your death to your trust. It is there only as a "catch-all" to cover assets that should have been, but were not for some reason, put in your trust before you died.

Now, your pour-over Will may never be used because everything you have either has a beneficiary designation, is titled in the name of your trust when you die, or survivors will somehow have access to the asset upon your death.

So, in summary, if you have a revocable living trust that is designed to avoid probate and provide for the distribution of your estate when you die, you’ll also have a Will, but your Will may never need to be used because the Will is there as a "catch-all" to allow for the transfer of assets that are in your name when you die and require a probate to access.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais

Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney

www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com

Phone: (225) 329-2450

How to Keep Your Farm or "Family Property" in the Family for Future Generations

Many parents who have both children and grandchildren want to keep some of the property that they own so that their kids and grandkids can enjoy the property for many years to come. Perhaps the parents have seen how much their kids and grandkids enjoy the property.

However, when parents pass away and their property is left to children, property rules apply that may conflict with what the parents are trying to accomplish. Customizing the right legal program can ensure that one rogue descendant, or perhaps even the spouse of one child or grandchild, will not be able to mess up or destroy the family property that you'd want them all to enjoy.

First, let's look at some of the Louisiana laws that apply when multiple owners own real estate in Louisiana. Louisiana has a rule that states that no owner can be compelled to own property with another. When children inherit their parents' land, the children are considered "owners in indivision."

Anyone who owns an undivided interest in real estate in Louisiana, regardless of how big or small their ownership interest, can sell their ownership interest, or can force a "partition" of the property. The two kinds of partition are "partition in kind" and "partition by licitation."

When a piece of property is susceptible to being divided into lots, an owner can force a partition in kind whereby each owner would wind up with their own tract. Or, particularly if property is not susceptible to division into lots, an owner in indivision can force a sale of the property and the proceeds would be distributed to the co-owners in proportion to their ownership interest in the property.

Due to these rights that co-owners have, family property often gets sold eliminating future descedants from being able to enjoy the property.

Some owners of property think that by forming a limited liability company (LLC), the owners can keep the property in the family for generations. While owners of property should consider forming an LLC, and transferring their property to it, this is more of a "protection from lawsuits" vehicle than a "keep it in the family for generations" vehicle. Placing the property in an LLC and leaving membership interests in the LLC to your descendants won't prevent an owner/member from (1) selling or disposing of their LLC interest; (2) a member's creditor seizing their interest; or (3) giving or bequeathing their LLC membership interest to a non-family member.

These conversations about keeping property in the family for generations often turn toward creating a family trust. Parents would name a trustee or co-trustees (perhaps the "responsible" descendant") who will manage the trust assets for the benefit of all of the children and grandchildren. Backup trustees would need to be provided for since this trust may be in existence for many decades. Thanks to trust law, the descendants (trust beneficiaries) would not be permitted to sell, alienate, or mortgage, their interest in the trust, and the creditors of a beneficiary could not seize their interest in the trust.

Other issues to consider before pulling the trigger on something like this include the gift and estate tax, future Medicaid qualification, leaving funds to the trust to provide for ongoing management and expenses, and perhaps having the parents transfer the property (or their LLC which owns the property) to a revocable trust now (which trust would become irrevocable when the parents die) in order to avoid having the property go through a court-supervised probate proceeding when they pass away.

Every set of family circumstances is unique. You likely only have one "shot" to get it right. And the decisions that you make (or don't make) will affect your descendants for many, many years to come.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais

Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney

www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com

Phone: (225) 329-2450

Pros and Cons of Leaving Everything to Your Spouse

When married couples engage in estate planning, one of the questions they often are required to answer is, "If I die before my spouse, do I want to leave complete ownership and control of my estate to my spouse?" Or, "Do I want to leave my estate to my spouse in a way that my children (or other heirs) are protected?"

Leaving all of your assets to your spouse is pretty easy to understand - when you die, your spouse owns everything. Maybe you are thinking that it is ok to leave everything to your spouse because you are confident that when your spouse dies, your spouse will leave it all to your kids. Or maybe you like the thought of leaving your estate to your spouse because your descendants circumstances may change after you die and you want your spouse to be able to leave the estate to your descendants the right way.

However, if you leave your estate to your spouse, your spouse "could" leave your estate to people other than your children, like your spouse's next spouse!

Some people want to leave their estate to their spouse in a way that their children or heirs are protected. The two common ways to do this are (1) in trust; and (2) via the Louisiana usufruct.

Leaving your estate to your spouse may be the best overall tax outcome, but it used to be the worst. In the old days, it did not make sense to leave your estate to your spouse because when you lumped your estate on top of your spouse's estate, it caused the spouse's estate to be subject to a 50% or more federal estate tax upon the death of the surviving spouse. But now, with an $11.4 million estate tax inclusion, and with portability (making it easier for married couples to exempt $22.8 million from the estate tax), rarely are couples penalized for leaving everything to each other.

The tax benefit that often results from leaving your estate to your spouse is that your heirs will benefit from a "double step up" in basis, for capital gains tax purposes. In community property states (like Louisiana) all community property gets a new stepped-up basis when the first spouse dies. And when you leave all of your assets to your spouse, all of the assets will get another step-up in basis when your spouse later dies. This can save considerable capital gains tax when assets are later sold, particularly if there is appreciation that occurs from the date of death of the first spouse to the date of death of the surviving spouse.

In addition, if you live in Louisiana, you are prohibited from leaving your entire estate to your spouse if you have forced heirs. Forced heirs are children of your that, at the time of your death, are 23 years of age or younger, or, are of any age but incapacitated.

Leaving assets to the surviving spouse is common for traditional families - one marriage and all children are from the one marriage. And if you really want to make it as simple as possible on your spouse when you pass away, consider establishing a revocable living trust and titling the appropriate assets in your trust. Assets in your living trust don't go through the court-supervised probate/Succession procedure, so having your assets in your living trust will prevent your spouse from having to hire lawyers and go through the courts just to get ownership of your assets after you die.

Other factors that are typically discussed when married couples engage in estate planning legal services include: who makes your decisions when you are incapable; protecting assets from long term care costs; and how will assets be managed and disbursed after both spouses pass away. These are all important components of any estate planning legal program.

Note also that if you have no legal plans in place, Louisiana laws won't do your spouse any favors. These laws will favor your descendants much more than your spouse.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais

Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney

www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com

Phone: (225) 329-2450

Two Types of Louisiana Last Wills: Part One - The Olographic Testament

In Louisiana, there are only two forms of valid Wills (known by our Louisiana law as “testaments.” The two forms are: olographic and notarial. This post addresses the less popular olographic (some people refer to it as an “holographic” Will).

When we discuss whether a handwritten Will is valid, we must look to the terms of the Louisiana statute that defines and olographic testament. Note that there are many, many court cases where lawyers have argued, and judges have determined, whether someone’s handwritten attempt at a Will is valid, and if so, how it should be interpreted.

Nonetheless, our Louisiana law states that “An olographic testament is one entirely written, dated, and signed in the handwriting of the testator.” The statute goes on to state, in part, what it means to be dated and signed, including the fact that writings after the signature do not make the testament invalid and such writing may be considered by the court, in its discretion, as part of the testament.

Many people think that if they just meet the validity requirements of an olographic testament, then everything will go hunky-dory when they pass away. But those people should think again.

It’s easy to make a valid olographic testament, but problems often surface after the death of the testator because the wording was either insufficient, ambiguous, errors were made, reasonable contingencies were not addressed, or bequests were made outright to people when they should not have due to age or financial immaturity.

The bottom line on Louisiana olographic Wills is that it is possible, if not simple, to write your own Will that would be recognized by a Louisiana court as a valid Will. However, if the reason you attempted to write your own Will was to save some costs today, know that the future costs to your estate and your heirs (both financial and emotional costs) will far outweigh any savings you felt you realized by making your own olographic testament.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais

Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney

www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com

Phone: (225) 329-2450

Don't Handwrite Changes on Your Last Will and Testament

I've seen many people over the years want to make changes to their existing last will and testament. Without knowing any better, they pull out their existing will, grab pen or pencil, and cross through the things they want to change while writing in replacement provisions.

For example, someone may want to change their executor. They feel that the previous executor they named (let's call him "Joe") is now a bum, and they want to replace Joe with Fred.

Or, let's say a Will provides a specific bequest either to an individual or charity of $100,000. But the testator now wants to change that bequest to $5,000.

There are a couple of Louisiana laws that are in play here. First, Louisiana law provides, in pertinent part, that a revocation of a testamentary provision occurs when the testator clearly revokes the provision or legacy by a signed writing on the testament itself.

So, the Louisiana rules are somewhat relaxed to permit the revocation of a provision in a last will by a signed writing that is not dated but which clearly revokes the provision.

However, regarding a replacement provision, the formalities are more stringent. Louisiana law provides that, "Any other modification of a testament must be in one of the forms prescribed for testaments.

Example: A woman pulls out her old will naming Joe as the executor. She scratches through Joe's name, writes in Fred's name, and signs the change. The result would be that Joe is no longer the executor because she revoked the provision by a signed writing, but Fred will not be the executor, because this modification is not in one of the forms prescribed for testaments - it does not meet the formality requirements of an olographic testament because it is not dated.

Be very careful when you attempt to change your Will. Your safest bet is to work with an attorney who understands the rules as they relate to revocations and modifications of testaments.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais

Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney

www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com

Phone: (225) 329-2450

Prohibited Substitution in Louisiana Last Will is Null

The Prohibited Substitution estate planning rules in Louisiana are a trap for the unwary. When someone writes a Louisiana last will and testament, or a trust, in a way that it contains a prohibited substitution, then the bequest is null.

So, what is a prohibited substitution? Well, here's an example of a provision in a Will that would be interpreted as a prohibited substitution, "I leave ownership of X to Person 1. I require that Person 1 preserve X and, when Person 1 dies, I require that Person 1 leave ownership of X to Person 2."

You cannot donate or leave something in full ownership to one person with a charge to preserve it and deliver it to a second person at the death of the first person. You would be depriving the first person from the power of testation.

A prohibited substitution might be something that I'd see in an olographic testament. Some people attempt to write their own wills in their own handwriting, but they mess up the provisions of the Will. People in Louisiana sometimes argue that they can write their own valid will, but they often fail to realize that the wording that they put in their will can make their loved one's lives miserable.

A prohibited substitution is null - it's as if it was never written. The bequest to the first person is not even valid.

There are a couple of alternative you can use if you want to leave an asset for the benefit of someone, and then when that someone dies, have the asset pass along to another someone. One way to do this is to use a trust - check with your estate planning attorney to help you do this the right way. Another option that might be feasible is to leave usufruct of an asset to someone, and name the naked owner to receive the asset at the termination of the usufruct. Again, check with your estate planning attorney to make sure that you understand the pros and cons of leaving things in trust or in usufruct.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais
Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney
www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com
Phone: (225) 329-2450

Collation Explained - Louisiana Estate Planning Law

When someone asks me what "Collation" means, it's typically because they've seen the word referenced in a last will and testament, and they don't know what it means.

This post describes a little history and current application of Louisiana collation law.

Back in the pre-1990's, there was a presumption in Louisiana estate law that parents were supposed to, from an inheritance standpoint, treat their children equally. If a parent made a gift to one child during the parent's lifetime, collation laws required that gift to be considered as an advance on that child's inheritance. 

So, back in the pre-1990's, parents were permitted, in their last will and testament, to dispense their lifetime gifts from collation so that lifetime gifts would not be considered an advance on a child's inheritance.

Then, in the 1990's the Louisiana Collation law changed significantly in a way that reduces the scope and application of collation by limiting the right to demand collation to children who qualify as forced heirs, and collation only applies with respect to gifts made within three years prior to the parent's death.

Now, under collation law, if a child is 24 and not otherwise disabled,  he or she is not permitted to demand collation. And a grandchild is not permitted to demand collation, even if he or she qualifies as a forced heir.

Nonetheless, many attorneys still include a provision in their client's wills stating, in effect, that the client's lifetime gifts are exempt from collation.

I haven't seen or heard anyone around our office discuss a potential collation claim in decades. Collation claims just don't come up much any more due to its limited scope. I suppose, however, it does not hurt to keep the "dispense from collation" provision in Louisiana last wills, even though it causes some confusion because clients have no idea what it means. 

However, now with this post, you know!

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Paul Rabalais
Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney
www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com
Phone: (225) 329-2450

Leaving Assets To A Louisiana Special Needs Trust

Special Needs Trusts enable people, typically parents, to provide for another (typically, their child), without jeopardizing the government benefits that the special needs child is receiving.

There is typically a problem when parents bequeath assets to their special needs children. When the child inherits in his or her own name, the child could lose valuable government benefits that the child is receiving. In order to originally qualify for these benefits, the child had to be "means-tested." Often, the child must have and maintain no more than $2,000 in their name to receive these benefits. If the child receives an inheritance, the child may lose these valuable benefits.

So many parents leave assets for the special needs child in a third-party Special Needs Trust. When done properly, the trust can enhance and enrich the child's life while preserving the government benefits that are means-tested.

In general, there are certain provisions that should not be included in a trust that you leave behind for your special needs child.  The trust should not authorize the trustee to make broad distributions to or for the health, education, maintenance, or support of the child (known as the "HEMS" standard). 

In addition, the trust must not allow the child/beneficiary to compel distributions to himself or herself.

However, there are a number of permissible distributions to or for the benefit of the special needs child, including distributions for medical needs, travel, recreation, home improvements, auto expenses, and cleaning, to name a few.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

Avoid Multiple Probates When Owning Property in Multiple States

Was helping a gentleman put his estate legal program in place. He had an old olographic last will and testament but he knew his family would need to go through probate when he died, and he knew he had none of the incapacity legal planning in place.

He owned a home here in Louisiana. And he owned a property on the beach in Florida, and he owned some land in Mississippi. We talked about how, if he owned all of that property in his name when he died, his family would first go through the Louisiana Succession to get his Louisiana property and his investments transferred to them. Then, they would go hire a new set of lawyers in Florida to go through the Florida probate to get the beach property transferred to them - the Louisiana Succession does not transfer out of state real estate. And then, his family would be off to seek out Mississippi lawyers to go through a Mississippi probate to transfer the Mississippi property to the family. Three probates. Three sets of lawyers. Three delays. Three hassles.

We then discussed how he could set up one Living Trust, and transfer all of his properties from different states into the one trust.  Then, when he dies, his Successor Trustee or Co-trustees can immediately either sell the properties or transfer them out of the trust to the appropriate family members - all outside of any probate.

Owning property in several different states can be a good reason to create your trust, transfer your properties to your trust, and avoid all those probates. Probates in other states, when you lived in Louisiana, are referred to as "ancillary probates." You can avoid them by planning ahead the right way.

Paul Rabalais
Louisiana Estate Planning Attorney
www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com
(225) 329-2450

Child Dies Before Parent: What Happens To Estate?

Typically toward the end of the estate planning conversation, a client asks the question, "What would happen to my estate if my child dies before me?"

There are a few different components to this question. First, if a Louisiana resident dies with no legal planning in place (no last will means they died "intestate"), then state law determines who gets what. For example, let's say Dad dies. Two years earlier, Daughter died. Daughter left three children. If Dad died intestate, Daughter's three children would inherit the portion that would have gone to Daughter. Daughter's three children "represent" their mother in Dad's Succession.

Now, let's say, Dad left a Will or a Trust when Dad died. Now, the estate planning legal documents Dad signed control what happens to Dad's estate. Most estate planning documents have, as a default provision, a statement that says that if a child predeceases a parent, then the child's share will go the child's children. However, when a person is putting an estate legal program in place, they can direct their estate as they wish. Many parents express that if their child predeceases, they do not want the child's share to go to the child's spouse or the child's step-children. Or some grandparents have grandchildren that have substance abuse problems and the grandparents do not want to dump an inheritance into a grandchild's lap. So, it's important to address these contingencies as you create your estate legal program.

What you can't do, however, is leave an inheritance to a child and then direct what happens to that inheritance when the child later dies. Once you leave an inheritance to someone (such as, a child), the inheritance belongs to the person who you left it to. You cannot control what they do with it. However, by leaving an inheritance in trust you may be able to exercise more control over what happens to the inherited assets after you pass away.

Gaining Access To Funds Payable To An Estate

I've been working with a family in order to gain access to funds that were payable to "Estate of Dad."

Dad died leaving a last will and testament. He named his two children as the co-executors and the equal heirs. Dad only left two assets in his name, a retirement account and a bank account. There were no designated beneficiaries named on the retirement account, and the bank froze the bank account that was in Dad's name only. The family could not gain access to any of these funds.

The steps one must go through to get access to these funds are as follows:

(1) Co-Executors Confirmed. We will prepare the necessary court pleadings to get the two children confirmed as the Independent Co-Executors. This paperwork, along with the signed original of Dad's last will gets filed at the parish courthouse. The pleadings make their way to a judge's office, and, if approved, the judge signs the court order confirming the children as the Independent Co-Executors. Then, the clerk of court will issue "Letters of Independent Co-Executorship,"

(2) Open Estate Account. The children must use these "Letters of Independent Co-Executorship" to open an estate account at a financial institution. The institution holding the retirement account funds, and the bank where the frozen account is held, will issue checks payable to "Estate of Dad." The co-executors will then deposit these checks into the Estate account.

So, in this matter, the simplest way to get access to Estate funds was to open the Succession, get the Executors confirmed, open an estate account, and then deposit estate funds in the estate account.

Sure , there is more to a Succession, such as preparing and filing the Detailed Descriptive List of Assets and Liabilities, and Petitioning for the Judgment of Possession, but it's these first steps that allows families access to funds payable to an Estate.